Skip to content

Woodfine Projects

The buildings-and-places record for Woodfine Capital Projects Inc.: six development classes, the design system behind them, and the site-selection method built on established retail anchors. Articles span regional markets across North America and Europe, the planned development program, and the maps and data behind the analysis.

Historical revision — this record as it stood on 26 August 2026, not the current version. View the current record →

MarketsIndex

The Markets covers where we look. This category holds the screening universe behind site selection — the Top 400 set, the tier and co-location indices behind them, and a profile page for every market that has one today.

Start here: Regional Markets Intelligence System

Screening Universe

Regional Markets Intelligence System is the reference article for the co-location analysis system, and Regional Market Definition sets out what qualifies a settlement as a Regional Market on the map. The Co-location Tier System explains the four-tier classification and how it applies across North American and European markets. The Top 400 — North America and the Top 400 — Europe are the two qualifying sets: four hundred suburban commuter-belt markets per continent that meet the co-location anchor-composition gates. No rank or score is published for any market in either set.

  • Regional Markets intelligence system — Reference article for the co-location analysis system that identifies suburban retail markets in North America and Europe.
  • Regional market definition — Spatial containers on the location intelligence map — how settlements with co-location presence differ from Regional Markets, and why coverage is not market strength.
  • Co-location tier system — The four-tier classification — Regional, District, Local, Fringe — assigned to every co-location cluster on the platform, the predicate gates that determine it, and how the system applies across North American and European markets.
  • Top 400 Regional Markets — North America — Set of 400 qualifying North American suburban Regional Markets, meeting the co-location anchor-composition gates. No rank or score is published.
  • Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe — Set of 399 verified distinct European Regional Markets across 400 list positions (one position vacant pending a genuine 400th entry) under the corrected suburban-regional methodology. No rank or score is published.

Co-Location Indices by Country

Seven country-level co-location indices supply the underlying cluster data the continental rankings are built from, each ranking named-anchor convergence node by node within its own country: United States, Canada, Mexico, Spain, Italy, Poland, and the Nordics.

  • atlas-co-location-index-us — Ranked index of the top co-location nodes in the United States, evaluated by the named-anchor methodology across Walmart Supercentre anchor locations.
  • atlas-co-location-index-canada — Ranked index of high-value co-location nodes in Canada, evaluating Walmart Supercentre anchor sites by proximity to Costco, Home Depot, and civic infrastructure.
  • Co-location index: Mexico — Ranked index of top commercial convergence nodes in Mexico, identifying sites where Walmart Supercentre anchors cluster with Home Depot, Costco, and civic infrastructure.
  • atlas-co-location-index-spain — Ranked index of co-location nodes across Spain, anchored by IKEA with secondary validation from Leroy Merlin and Makro within the Iberian Peninsula.
  • atlas-co-location-index-italy — Ranked index of institutional-grade co-location nodes in Italy, centered on IKEA anchor locations with secondary convergence from Leroy Merlin and Makro.
  • atlas-co-location-index-poland — Ranked index of high-growth commercial convergence nodes in Poland, where IKEA anchors cluster with Makro, Leroy Merlin, Auchan, and civic infrastructure.
  • Co-location index: Nordics — Ranked index of commercial convergence sites across Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland, anchored by IKEA with Nordic secondary operators.

Country Breakouts

Nine country-level Regional Market indices filter the continental Top 400 tables down to a single country's entries: Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Poland, Greece, Croatia, and Norway.

  • Canada — Regional Market index — Index of Canadian regional commercial real estate markets meeting co-location screening thresholds.
  • United States — Regional Market index — Index of US regional commercial real estate markets meeting co-location screening thresholds across all major census regions.
  • United Kingdom — Regional Market index — Index of UK regional commercial real estate markets meeting co-location screening thresholds outside London and the South East.
  • Spain — Regional Market index — Index of Spanish regional commercial real estate markets meeting co-location screening thresholds.
  • Italy — Regional Market index — Index of the 21 Italian entries in the Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe list, filtered from the continental table with metro-reference groupings.
  • Poland — Regional Market index — Index of the 16 Polish entries in the Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe list, filtered from the continental table with metro-reference groupings.
  • Greece — Regional Market index — Index of the 7 Greek entries in the Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe list; a pilot-batch country page with 7 new stub market profiles built 2026-08-25.
  • Croatia — Regional Market index — Index of the 9 Croatian entries in the Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe list; a country page with 9 new stub market profiles built 2026-08-25, following the locked wave-1.5 template.
  • Norway — Regional Market index — Index of the 9 Norwegian entries in the Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe list; a country page with 9 new stub market profiles built 2026-08-25, following the locked wave-1.5 template.

Market Profiles

41 individual market profile pages exist today (EN+ES pairs), each with population and economic context sourced from Wikipedia.

Verified TOP400 entries (16): co-location cluster composition current as of the 2026-08-07 dataset. No rank or score is published for any entry; list order below is alphabetical by profile slug, not ordinal.

Note: Greenville–Spartanburg, United States appears in the North American Top 400 table linked from this profile, but the profile page itself describes Spartanburg as a metro-core reference point rather than a ranked suburban entry. This is a pre-existing inconsistency in the underlying data, not resolved by this edit — flagged for a future data-reconciliation pass rather than corrected unilaterally here.

Profile Market Continent
Plano, United States Plano, TX North America
Mississauga, Canada Mississauga, ON North America
Frisco, United States Frisco, TX North America
Greenville–Spartanburg, United States Spartanburg, SC North America
Tempe, United States Tempe, AZ North America
Torrance, United States Torrance, CA North America
Provo–Orem, United States Provo, UT North America
Kenner, United States Kenner, LA North America
Eagan, United States Eagan, MN North America
Järfälla, Sweden Järfälla Europe
York, England York Europe
Warrington, England Warrington Europe
Cherwell, England Cherwell Europe
Northampton, England Northampton Europe
Bielsko-Biała, Poland Bielsko-Biała Europe
Chester, England Cheshire West and Chester Europe

Reference-only profiles (16) — real places that are not currently part of the TOP400 set: either metro-core reference points for other entries, or standalone markets outside the 15–80 km suburban band. Each profile page says so explicitly rather than presenting a market outside the set as if it were included.

North America: Lethbridge, Canada, Kelowna, Canada, Moncton, Canada, Barrie–Innisfil, Canada, Regina, Canada, Colorado Springs, United States, Fort Collins, United States, Wichita, United States, Spokane, United States, Madison, United States.

Europe: Zaragoza, Spain, Burgos, Spain, Valladolid, Spain, Pamplona, Spain, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, Inverness, Scotland.

Retired (2026-08-17), not part of the current TOP400 or reference-only counts above (9): seven German city profiles plus Chambéry (France) and Breda (Netherlands) — those three countries are deliberately excluded from the current Regional Markets methodology (locked 2026-06-30). The pages remain available for historical reference; the Auto-generated list below includes them, each labelled retired, for completeness — none are cited as TOP400 or reference-only entries above.

Correction (2026-08-24): the count split above was previously mislabelled 20 verified / 21 reference-only. The current, accurate split against the live 2026-08-07 dataset and the 2026-08-17 retirements is 16 verified / 16 reference-only / 9 retired (41 total).

  • Lethbridge, Canada — Southern Alberta market, 215 km from Calgary — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Kelowna, Canada — Okanagan Valley market, 390 km from Vancouver — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Moncton, Canada — Maritime Canada's commercial hub — outside the current Top-400 set (no single dominant major metro core in the region).
  • Barrie–Innisfil, Canada — Central Ontario market, 90 km from Toronto — just outside the current Top-400 set's 80 km band.
  • Mississauga, Canada — North American Regional Market — suburb of Toronto, 24.9 km; 2 Regional-tier, 1 District-tier, and 2 Local-tier clusters.
  • Regina, Canada — Saskatchewan's provincial capital — outside the current Top-400 set (no nearby major metro core).
  • de-bw-ulm — Baden-Württemberg city functioning as a metro-core reference point for surrounding suburban markets — not itself in the Top-400 set.
  • de-by-augsburg — Bavarian city functioning as a metro-core reference point for surrounding suburban markets — not itself in the Top-400 set.
  • de-by-nurnberg — Bavarian metro-core reference point for surrounding suburban markets — not itself in the Top-400 set.
  • de-nw-bielefeld — North Rhine-Westphalia city functioning as a metro-core reference point for surrounding suburban markets — not itself in the Top-400 set.
  • de-nw-krefeld — European Regional Market — suburb of Düsseldorf, 19.4 km; 2 Regional-tier clusters.
  • de-rp-kaiserslautern — European Regional Market — suburb of Mannheim, 54 km; 2 Regional-tier clusters.
  • de-th-erfurt — Thuringia's state capital — outside the current Top-400 set (no nearby major metro core).
  • Zaragoza, Spain — Aragon's regional capital, roughly 300 km from Madrid, Barcelona, and Valencia alike — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Burgos, Spain — Castile and León city, 244 km from Madrid — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Valladolid, Spain — Castile and León's largest city, 235 km from Madrid — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Pamplona, Spain — Navarre's regional capital, 117 km from Bilbao — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain — Basque Country capital — outside the current Top-400 set (no nearby major metro core in the dataset).
  • fr-chambery — European Regional Market — suburb of Grenoble; 1 Regional-tier and 1 Local-tier cluster.
  • Cherwell, England — European Regional Market — suburb of Oxford; 2 Local-tier clusters.
  • Chester, England — Cheshire heritage city, 30-40 miles from Liverpool — not currently a Top-400 entry despite sitting within the suburban-regional distance band.
  • Northampton, England — European Regional Market — suburb of Coventry; 2 Local-tier clusters.
  • Warrington, England — European Regional Market — suburb of Wigan; 1 District-tier and 1 Local-tier cluster.
  • York, England — European Regional Market — suburb of Leeds; 1 District-tier and 2 Local-tier clusters.
  • Inverness, Scotland — Scottish Highlands capital, well beyond commuting distance of Edinburgh or Glasgow — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • nl-breda — European Regional Market — suburb of Rotterdam; 1 Regional-tier and 1 Local-tier cluster.
  • Bielsko-Biała, Poland — European Regional Market — suburb of Katowice, 48 km; 2 Regional-tier clusters.
  • Järfälla, Sweden — European Regional Market — suburb of Stockholm; 1 Regional-tier cluster.
  • Tempe, United States — North American Regional Market — suburb of Phoenix; 1 Regional-tier and 2 Local-tier clusters.
  • Torrance, United States — North American Regional Market — suburb of Los Angeles; 1 Regional-tier cluster.
  • Colorado Springs, United States — Colorado metro-core reference point for a surrounding suburban market — not itself in the Top-400 set.
  • Fort Collins, United States — Northern Colorado market, 60 miles from Denver — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Wichita, United States — Kansas's largest city, well beyond commuting distance of any major metro — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Kenner, United States — North American Regional Market — suburb of New Orleans; 1 District-tier and 1 Local-tier cluster.
  • Eagan, United States — North American Regional Market — suburb of Minneapolis; 1 Regional-tier cluster.
  • Greenville–Spartanburg, United States — South Carolina Upstate metro-core reference point for surrounding suburban markets — not itself in the Top-400 set.
  • Frisco, United States — North American Regional Market — suburb of Dallas, 44 km; 3 Regional-tier and 1 District-tier cluster.
  • Plano, United States — North American Regional Market — suburb of Dallas, 28.1 km; 3 Regional-tier, 2 District-tier, and 1 Local-tier cluster.
  • Provo–Orem, United States — North American Regional Market — suburb of Salt Lake City; 1 Regional-tier cluster.
  • Spokane, United States — Eastern Washington's second-largest city, 280 miles from Seattle — outside the current Top-400 set.
  • Madison, United States — Wisconsin's capital and second-largest city, 77 miles from Milwaukee — outside the current Top-400 set.

Superseded and Retired

Two "Regional Markets" articles predate the current co-location system: Regional Markets and the Regional Market Matrix describe an earlier 8-market direct-hold matrix with a definition of "Regional Market" that directly contradicts the system now in use; both are marked status: superseded. Three country index pages — France, Germany, and Netherlands — are marked status: retired, since those countries are deliberately excluded from the current Regional Markets methodology (locked 2026-06-30). All five remain available for historical reference only.

  • about-regional-markets — SUPERSEDED (2026-07-10) — see about-regional-markets-system for the current framework. Prior definition described a narrower, standalone-city investment matrix (50k-300k population, explicitly not metro suburbs), pre-dating the 18-country suburban co-location system now in use.
  • about-regional-market-matrix — SUPERSEDED (2026-07-10) — see about-regional-markets-system for the current framework. Prior definition described MCorp's 8-target-market direct-hold matrix, pre-dating the 18-country suburban co-location system now in use.
  • atlas-france — RETIRED (2026-08-17) — France is deliberately excluded from the current Regional Markets methodology (locked 2026-06-30). The content below is historical and does not appear in the current Top 400 set.
  • atlas-germany — RETIRED (2026-08-17) — Germany is deliberately excluded from the current Regional Markets methodology (locked 2026-06-30). The content below is historical and does not appear in the current Top 400 set.
  • atlas-netherlands — RETIRED (2026-08-17) — Netherlands is deliberately excluded from the current Regional Markets methodology (locked 2026-06-30). The content below is historical and does not appear in the current Top 400 set.

See also

Important Information

Important Information

Securities offering. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine") sponsors real-property direct-hold solutions. Interests in those solutions are offered only to investors who qualify under an applicable prospectus exemption — including the accredited-investor exemption under National Instrument 45-106 — Prospectus Exemptions, and equivalent exemptions in other applicable jurisdictions. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. Any offering is made exclusively by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum, which prospective investors should review, together with their own professional advisors, before investing.

Scope. This wiki describes Woodfine's research methodology, geographic data platform, and related activities at a high level and is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Private Placement Memorandum and the governing documents of the relevant issuer.

Risk. Investment in real-property direct-hold solutions involves significant risk, including possible loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. References to structural features such as advisory fees, transferability, and net asset value methodology describe the contractual terms of the direct-hold solutions and are not representations as to investment outcomes or returns.

Forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results may differ materially. Woodfine undertakes no obligation to update such statements except as required by law.

Registration. Registrable activities of Woodfine and its affiliates are conducted, where required, under the applicable registration categories prescribed by the British Columbia Securities Commission and other Canadian securities regulators. Specific registration details are available on request.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Trademarks. The full trademark notice appears in the footer of every page on this site.

Content licence. The text of this wiki is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Readers may quote this content verbatim, with attribution to Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. Readers may not alter, transform, or redistribute a modified version of this content.

Changes to this notice. Woodfine may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →