Skip to content

Woodfine Projects

The buildings-and-places record for Woodfine Capital Projects Inc.: six development classes, the design system behind them, and the site-selection method built on established retail anchors. Articles span regional markets across North America and Europe, the planned development program, and the maps and data behind the analysis.

Woodfine Capital Projects

Revision as of · d2d6f434

Historical revision — this record as it stood on 18 August 2026, not the current version. View the current record →

Poland — Regional Market index

The Poland regional market index ranks the 16 Polish entries in the Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe list. Each entry is a named suburb or satellite municipality between 15 and 80 kilometres of a major Polish metropolitan reference point that contains at least one retail co-location cluster, screened and scored under the co-location regional market framework. This page is a filtered, Poland-specific view of that continental table — not a separate dataset — so every rank, score, and tier count below matches the continental table exactly and updates automatically if that table is corrected.

Metropolitan groupings

Poland's 16 markets cluster most heavily around Katowice (4 markets), reflecting the density of the Upper Silesian Industrial Region's suburban belt — the same regional cluster that anchors Bielsko-Biała, one of Poland's highest-scoring entries. Kraków (3) and Gdańsk (2) form a second tier. The remaining markets are single entries reporting to Kielce, Bydgoszcz, Łódź, Gliwice, Warsaw, Wrocław, and Łomża.

Score distribution

Bielsko-Biała (suburb of Katowice, score 12.0) is Poland's highest-scoring entry — two Tier 1 clusters with a civic anchor — followed by Radom (suburb of Kielce, score 10.5, a rare T1+T2+T3 combination with a civic anchor). Toruń and Częstochowa both score 9.0 on a Tier 1 + Tier 2 combination. Most of Poland's remaining entries score 6.0 on a single Tier 1 cluster, and Gdynia and Nowy Sącz score 4.5 on a Tier 2+Tier 3 combination. Poczesna and Rumia are Poland's lowest-ranked entries at 4.0.

Ranked markets

Rank Market Suburb of km T1 T2 T3 Civic Score
6 Bielsko-Biała Katowice 48 2 0 0 Yes 12.0
8 Radom Kielce 69 1 1 1 Yes 10.5
25 Toruń Bydgoszcz 45 1 1 0 Yes 9.0
26 Częstochowa Katowice — 1 1 0 — 9.0
249 Tarnów Kraków — 1 0 0 — 6.0
250 Piotrków Trybunalski Łódź — 1 0 0 — 6.0
251 Żory Gliwice — 1 0 0 — 6.0
252 Piaseczno Warsaw — 1 0 0 — 6.0
253 Tychy Katowice — 1 0 0 — 6.0
254 Lubin Wrocław — 1 0 0 — 6.0
255 Ostrołęka Łomża — 1 0 0 — 6.0
256 Nowy Targ Kraków — 1 0 0 — 6.0
328 Gdynia Gdańsk — 0 1 1 — 4.5
329 Nowy Sącz Kraków — 0 1 1 — 4.5
351 Poczesna Katowice — 1 0 0 — 4.0
352 Rumia Gdańsk — 1 0 0 — 4.0

See also

Important Information

Important Information

Securities offering. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine") sponsors real-property direct-hold solutions. Interests in those solutions are offered only to investors who qualify under an applicable prospectus exemption — including the accredited-investor exemption under National Instrument 45-106 — Prospectus Exemptions, and equivalent exemptions in other applicable jurisdictions. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. Any offering is made exclusively by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum, which prospective investors should review, together with their own professional advisors, before investing.

Scope. This wiki describes Woodfine's research methodology, geographic data platform, and related activities at a high level and is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Private Placement Memorandum and the governing documents of the relevant issuer.

Risk. Investment in real-property direct-hold solutions involves significant risk, including possible loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. References to structural features such as advisory fees, transferability, and net asset value methodology describe the contractual terms of the direct-hold solutions and are not representations as to investment outcomes or returns.

Forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results may differ materially. Woodfine undertakes no obligation to update such statements except as required by law.

Registration. Registrable activities of Woodfine and its affiliates are conducted, where required, under the applicable registration categories prescribed by the British Columbia Securities Commission and other Canadian securities regulators. Specific registration details are available on request.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Trademarks. The full trademark notice appears in the footer of every page on this site.

Content licence. The text of this wiki is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Readers may quote this content verbatim, with attribution to Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. Readers may not alter, transform, or redistribute a modified version of this content.

Changes to this notice. Woodfine may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →