Site ledger integration
docs(projects): trim leaked platform-implementation passages from real-estate articles -- sprint numbers, UI element names (Method modal, BentoBox, Inspector Panel), internal service/pipeline/file names removed from 13 site-selection/markets/gis/urban articles while preserving all real-estate content; no cross-wiki pointers introduced (26 files)
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ status: active audience: customer-woodfine bcsc_class: current-fact language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC last_edited: 2026-07-11 last_edited: 2026-08-26 editor: pointsav-engineering short_description: "Operational link binding each physical construction site to an isolated digital archive container, maintaining immutable audit records from groundbreak through commissioning." paired_with: gis/site-ledger-integration.es.md @@ -34,9 +34,7 @@ Once committed, entries are immutable. A daily log for a given date cannot be ov ## Verifiable construction audits The accumulation of daily logs across the construction period constitutes a verifiable audit trail. An investor, a regulatory body, or a future buyer can reconstruct the development history from the ledger without relying on the developer's self-reported account. The records exist independently of the developer's ongoing custody. This transparency is a fiduciary output of the Fiduciary Data Mandate — the obligation to maintain mathematical ownership of investor-relevant data extends to construction records for assets held in the Direct-Hold portfolio. The accumulation of daily logs across the construction period constitutes a verifiable audit trail. An investor, a regulatory body, or a future buyer can reconstruct the development history from the ledger without relying on the developer's self-reported account. The records exist independently of the developer's ongoing custody, for assets held in the Direct-Hold portfolio. ## See also