Retail brand family taxonomy
docs(site-selection): redact internal repo path/gating-logic formula/class name from retail-brand-family-taxonomy's IKEA-classification callout -- keeps the substantive unresolved cross-system-inconsistency flag (real, not yet reconciled) while removing infrastructure exposure and provenance-narration framing (public-repo safety review, found via lint during the site-selection remediation sweep)
@@ -28,17 +28,16 @@ Every retail location on the [[co-location-methodology|co-location]] map carries Large-format general merchandise and grocery retailers operating facilities of 80,000 square feet or more. Includes Walmart Supercenter, Target, Carrefour Hypermarket, IKEA, and equivalents across [[atlas-tier-index-north-america|North American]] and [[atlas-tier-index-europe|European]] markets. Hypermarket stores are the primary anchor type in the co-location methodology — cluster formation requires one Hypermarket anchor. Displayed with a navy badge. **Correction (2026-08-02, verified against canonical `origin/main:app-orchestration- gis/SCORING-METHODOLOGY.md` V3):** IKEA belongs to a separate `ALPHA_LIFESTYLE` anchor class in the real pipeline, kept structurally apart from Hypermarket so it can independently satisfy the T1 gate's `(Warehouse ∧ Hypermarket) OR (Lifestyle ∧ Hypermarket)` logic — folding IKEA into Hypermarket here collapses that gate's actual logic for a reader trying to understand it. This article also mixes vocabulary from other systems ("first/second scoring criterion" is V2-era sequential-scoring language, not V3's predicate gates; "tertiary scoring" borrows the separate Five-Degree system's "Tertiary Target" term), reinforcing that it blends several of this wiki's parallel tier systems rather than describing one consistently. **Flagged, not resolved.** IKEA belongs to a separate lifestyle-anchor class in the live scoring pipeline, kept structurally apart from Hypermarket so it can independently satisfy a qualifying-anchor gate that treats warehouse-format and lifestyle-format anchors as distinct paths to the same tier — folding IKEA into Hypermarket here collapses that distinction for a reader trying to understand it. This article also mixes vocabulary from other systems — "first/second scoring criterion" is sequential-scoring language, distinct from the current predicate-gate structure, and "tertiary scoring" borrows a separate tier system's terminology — reinforcing that it blends several of this wiki's parallel tier systems rather than describing one consistently. This is an unresolved cross-system inconsistency, not yet reconciled into a single canonical scoring description. ### Hardware