Co-location tier nomenclature
fix(privacy): sync jwoodfine fork with canonical — pulls in 2026-08-03 jmwoodfine@gmail.com redaction (NEXT.md item 20) + 60 other canonical commits since fork diverged
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- schema: foundry-doc-v1 title: "Co-location Tier Nomenclature" title: "Co-location tier nomenclature" slug: co-location-tier-nomenclature category: site-selection type: topic @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ status: active audience: customer-woodfine bcsc_class: current-fact language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC last_edited: 2026-05-25 last_edited: 2026-07-11 editor: pointsav-engineering short_description: "The four tier labels — Regional, District, Local, Fringe — visible on the co-location map follow the International Council of Shopping Centres retail property hierarchy, providing a nomenclature that carries meaning independently of the platform itself. Sprint 17 (May 2026) introduced both the ICSC labels and the V3 pure-predicate tier engine." paired_with: site-selection/co-location-tier-nomenclature.es.md @@ -42,6 +42,19 @@ The tier labels have been renamed twice since the platform launched. **Sprint 17 (May 2026):** The Sprint 9 labels were replaced with the ICSC hierarchy: Regional, District, Local, Fringe. The motivation was alignment with an internationally recognised nomenclature that carries meaning without requiring platform-specific context. A planner who opens the inspector without reading documentation knows what "Regional" means; "Prime" required learning. **Correction (2026-08-02):** two defects. (1) The real ICSC shopping-center hierarchy is Neighborhood/Community/Regional/Super Regional — it has no "District," "Local," or "Fringe" tier; only "Regional" is a genuine ICSC term. (2) This article asserts the T1/T2/T3 numeric scheme was retired platform-wide, but its own sibling articles [[co-location-tiering-scoring]] (a DBSCAN-based T1/T2/T3 system, `last_edited: 2026-07-03`) and [[co-location-ranking-system]] (a separate T1/T2/T3 spatial-cluster scheme) both present T1/T2/T3 as live and current, and [[reference/gis-cluster-scoring-glossary|gis-cluster-scoring-glossary]] documents a third, numerically-thresholded T1 Valid/T2 Hub/T3 Apex system as current. This article performs no reconciliation with any of them — this wiki maintains several unreconciled parallel co-location tier systems that reuse the same labels. **Flagged, not resolved.** The Spanish-language equivalents are: Regional, Distrital, Local, Marginal. ## What Changed and What Did Not