Retail co-location methodology
← All revisions
fix(site-selection): register rewrite — route GIS/engineering spec (EPSG/H3/DBSCAN/haversine/IoU formulas) to gis.woodfinegroup.com by consequence-plus-pointer, remove correction/provenance internal-note leaks, rename od-catchment-methodology to distance-band methodology to fix its self-contradicting title (Fable/Opus cross-model synthesis, operator-directed)
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ The Woodfine co-location methodology measures it. It classifies development site A node qualifies when a hypermarket, a warehouse club, and a home-improvement superstore have each independently committed capital within a defined catchment radius of one another. Each operator runs its own site-selection process; convergence is independent corroboration, not a single forecast. The qualification logic, [[co-location-cluster-formation|cluster formation]], and the [[co-location-anchors|anchor]] adjacency requirement are the three structural inputs to the index. For a capital allocator the index is a defensive filter: it prioritises the sites where several parties have independently validated the trade area. This article covers the anchor taxonomy and the tier system's predicate gates; sibling articles describe the [[od-catchment-methodology|O-D catchment methodology]], the [[trade-area-data-sources|trade-area data sources]], and the [[catchment-ranking-methodology-v3|catchment ranking methodology]]. For a capital allocator the index is a defensive filter: it prioritises the sites where several parties have independently validated the trade area. This article covers the anchor taxonomy and the tier system's predicate gates; sibling articles describe the [[od-catchment-methodology|distance-band methodology]], the [[trade-area-data-sources|trade-area data sources]], and the [[catchment-ranking-methodology-v3|catchment ranking methodology]]. ## Anchor taxonomy