Skip to content

Woodfine Projects

The buildings-and-places record for Woodfine Capital Projects Inc.: six development classes, the design system behind them, and the site-selection method built on established retail anchors. Articles span regional markets across North America and Europe, the planned development program, and the maps and data behind the analysis.

Woodfine Capital Projects

United Kingdom — Regional Market index

← All revisions

5e6d9c77 · Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ·

docs(projects): Phase 1 of Regional Markets rebuild -- remove all ranking/score language and stale/wrong score values wiki-wide (132 files); no public ranking exists in the real current dataset, only the co-location cluster tier system (Regional/District/Local/Fringe) remains, per operator directive and verified against the real 2026-08-07 methodology

View the full record as of this revision →

@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ audience: customer-woodfine
bcsc_class: current-fact
language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC
keynote: false
last_edited: 2026-08-24
last_edited: 2026-08-25
editor: woodfine-editorial
short_description: "Ranked index of UK regional commercial real estate markets meeting co-location screening thresholds outside London and the South East."
short_description: "Index of UK regional commercial real estate markets meeting co-location screening thresholds outside London and the South East."
paired_with: markets/atlas-united-kingdom.es.md
---

The **United Kingdom regional market index** ranks UK cities and towns outside London and
The **United Kingdom regional market index** lists UK cities and towns outside London and
the wider South East. Each meets the population, income, and retail infrastructure thresholds
established by the [[about-regional-markets-system|co-location regional market framework]]. The UK offers
a geographically concentrated but economically diverse set of qualifying regional markets: mid-sized
@@ -69,103 +69,103 @@ real TOP400 data below — Northampton, Warrington, and York all appear, and Che
under its full local-authority name, Cheshire West and Chester. **Inverness is the one
exception**: it does not appear among the UK's 81 verified TOP400 entries, despite being
named above as a primary Scotland market. As with the other country pages, this doesn't
mean Inverness isn't a real market — it means it is not currently ranked in the TOP400
mean Inverness isn't a real market — it means it is not currently included in the TOP400
co-location screen specifically.

## Ranked markets
## Markets

This table is a filtered, UK-specific view of the continental
[[atlas-top-400-europe|Top 400 Regional Markets — Europe]] table — not a separate dataset
— so every rank, score, and tier count matches the continental table exactly and updates
automatically if that table is corrected. UK entries are recorded at the local-authority
level (e.g. "Cheshire West and Chester," "East Riding of Yorkshire") rather than by
settlement name.

| Rank | Market | Suburb of | km | T1 | T2 | T3 | Civic | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fife | Edinburgh | 19 | 0 | 3 | 1 | Yes | 10.5 |
| 10 | Milton Keynes | Luton | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Yes | 9.0 |
| 14 | Hertsmere | London | 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Yes | 9.0 |
| 27 | Wiltshire | Bath | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | — | 9.0 |
| 28 | Cheshire East | Manchester | — | 0 | 3 | 0 | — | 9.0 |
| 30 | Hillingdon | London | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | — | 7.5 |
| 31 | Derby | Nottingham | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | — | 7.5 |
| 32 | [[gb-eng-chester|Cheshire West and Chester]] | Wigan | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | — | 7.5 |
| 54 | Durham | Newcastle | — | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | 7.5 |
| 55 | East Riding of Yorkshire | Leeds | — | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | 7.5 |
| 57 | Thurrock | London | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 58 | Gloucester | Bristol | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 59 | Rushmoor | Reading | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 265 | Stevenage | Luton | — | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | 6.0 |
| 266 | [[gb-eng-york|York]] | Leeds | — | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | 6.0 |
| 267 | Redbridge | London | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 268 | Wakefield | Leeds | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 269 | Ipswich | Cambridge | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 270 | East Hertfordshire | Luton | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 271 | North Lincolnshire | Sheffield | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 272 | Herefordshire | Birmingham | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 273 | Carmarthenshire | Swansea | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 274 | Peterborough | Cambridge | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 275 | High Peak | Manchester | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 276 | Huntingdonshire | Cambridge | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 277 | Darlington | Newcastle | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 278 | East Staffordshire | Birmingham | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 279 | Mid Sussex | Brighton | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 280 | Mendip | Bath | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6.0 |
| 287 | Liverpool | Wigan | — | 0 | 0 | 3 | — | 4.5 |
| 289 | Havering | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 290 | Enfield | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 291 | Sefton | Wigan | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 292 | Havant | Southampton | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 293 | Stroud | Bristol | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 294 | [[gb-eng-warrington|Warrington]] | Wigan | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 295 | Newport | Cardiff | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 296 | Saint Edmundsbury | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 297 | Colchester | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 298 | Warwick | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 299 | Lincoln | Nottingham | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 300 | Cheltenham | Bristol | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 301 | Stoke-on-Trent | Manchester | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 302 | Stafford | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 303 | Chelmsford | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 304 | Mole Valley | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 305 | Swindon | Oxford | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 306 | Barnsley | Sheffield | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 307 | Taunton Deane | Cardiff | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 308 | Perthshire and Kinross | Dundee | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 309 | South Somerset | Bath | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 310 | Doncaster | Sheffield | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 311 | Basingstoke and Deane | Reading | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 4.5 |
| 365 | Spelthorne | London | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 366 | Bexley | London | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 367 | Wirral | Wigan | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 368 | [[gb-eng-cherwell|Cherwell]] | Oxford | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 369 | Kingston upon Hull | Leeds | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 370 | Medway | London | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 371 | Arun | Brighton | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 372 | [[gb-eng-northampton|Northampton]] | Coventry | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 373 | Eastbourne | Brighton | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 374 | Bedford | Luton | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3.0 |
| 383 | Dartford | London | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 384 | Pembrokeshire | Swansea | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 385 | Wycombe | Reading | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 386 | West Oxfordshire | Oxford | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 387 | West Berkshire | Reading | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 388 | Walsall | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 389 | Mansfield | Nottingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 390 | Ashfield | Nottingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 391 | Tunbridge Wells | Brighton | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 392 | Forest Heath | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 393 | Epping Forest | London | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 394 | Braintree | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 395 | Stratford-on-Avon | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 396 | West Lindsey | Sheffield | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 397 | Cotswold | Bath | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 398 | Sevenoaks | London | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 399 | East Ayrshire | Glasgow | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
| 400 | Cannock Chase | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3.0 |
— so every entry and tier count matches the continental table exactly and updates
automatically if that table is corrected. No rank or score is published for any market.
UK entries are recorded at the local-authority level (e.g. "Cheshire West and Chester,"
"East Riding of Yorkshire") rather than by settlement name.

| Market | Suburb of | km | T1 | T2 | T3 | Civic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fife | Edinburgh | 19 | 0 | 3 | 1 | Yes |
| Milton Keynes | Luton | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Yes |
| Hertsmere | London | 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Yes |
| Wiltshire | Bath | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | — |
| Cheshire East | Manchester | — | 0 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Hillingdon | London | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Derby | Nottingham | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| [[gb-eng-chester|Cheshire West and Chester]] | Wigan | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Durham | Newcastle | — | 0 | 2 | 1 | — |
| East Riding of Yorkshire | Leeds | — | 0 | 2 | 1 | — |
| Thurrock | London | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Gloucester | Bristol | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Rushmoor | Reading | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Stevenage | Luton | — | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| [[gb-eng-york|York]] | Leeds | — | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Redbridge | London | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Wakefield | Leeds | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Ipswich | Cambridge | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| East Hertfordshire | Luton | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| North Lincolnshire | Sheffield | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Herefordshire | Birmingham | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Carmarthenshire | Swansea | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Peterborough | Cambridge | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| High Peak | Manchester | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Huntingdonshire | Cambridge | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Darlington | Newcastle | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| East Staffordshire | Birmingham | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Mid Sussex | Brighton | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Mendip | Bath | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Liverpool | Wigan | — | 0 | 0 | 3 | — |
| Havering | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Enfield | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Sefton | Wigan | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Havant | Southampton | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Stroud | Bristol | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| [[gb-eng-warrington|Warrington]] | Wigan | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Newport | Cardiff | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Saint Edmundsbury | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Colchester | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Warwick | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Lincoln | Nottingham | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Cheltenham | Bristol | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Stoke-on-Trent | Manchester | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Stafford | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Chelmsford | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Mole Valley | London | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Swindon | Oxford | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Barnsley | Sheffield | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Taunton Deane | Cardiff | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Perthshire and Kinross | Dundee | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| South Somerset | Bath | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Doncaster | Sheffield | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Basingstoke and Deane | Reading | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Spelthorne | London | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Bexley | London | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Wirral | Wigan | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| [[gb-eng-cherwell|Cherwell]] | Oxford | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Kingston upon Hull | Leeds | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Medway | London | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Arun | Brighton | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| [[gb-eng-northampton|Northampton]] | Coventry | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Eastbourne | Brighton | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Bedford | Luton | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dartford | London | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Pembrokeshire | Swansea | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Wycombe | Reading | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| West Oxfordshire | Oxford | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| West Berkshire | Reading | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Walsall | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Mansfield | Nottingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Ashfield | Nottingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Tunbridge Wells | Brighton | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Forest Heath | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Epping Forest | London | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Braintree | Cambridge | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Stratford-on-Avon | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| West Lindsey | Sheffield | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Cotswold | Bath | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Sevenoaks | London | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| East Ayrshire | Glasgow | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Cannock Chase | Birmingham | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |

## See also

- [[atlas-top-400-europe]] — the full European ranked list this page filters
- [[atlas-top-400-europe]] — the full European market set this page filters
- [[about-regional-markets-system]] — the co-location methodology and market selection criteria
Important Information

Important Information

Securities offering. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine") sponsors real-property direct-hold solutions. Interests in those solutions are offered only to investors who qualify under an applicable prospectus exemption — including the accredited-investor exemption under National Instrument 45-106 — Prospectus Exemptions, and equivalent exemptions in other applicable jurisdictions. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. Any offering is made exclusively by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum, which prospective investors should review, together with their own professional advisors, before investing.

Scope. This wiki describes Woodfine's research methodology, geographic data platform, and related activities at a high level and is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Private Placement Memorandum and the governing documents of the relevant issuer.

Risk. Investment in real-property direct-hold solutions involves significant risk, including possible loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. References to structural features such as advisory fees, transferability, and net asset value methodology describe the contractual terms of the direct-hold solutions and are not representations as to investment outcomes or returns.

Forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results may differ materially. Woodfine undertakes no obligation to update such statements except as required by law.

Registration. Registrable activities of Woodfine and its affiliates are conducted, where required, under the applicable registration categories prescribed by the British Columbia Securities Commission and other Canadian securities regulators. Specific registration details are available on request.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Trademarks. The full trademark notice appears in the footer of every page on this site.

Content licence. The text of this wiki is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Readers may quote this content verbatim, with attribution to Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. Readers may not alter, transform, or redistribute a modified version of this content.

Changes to this notice. Woodfine may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →