Skip to content

Woodfine Projects

The buildings-and-places record for Woodfine Capital Projects Inc.: six development classes, the design system behind them, and the site-selection method built on established retail anchors. Articles span regional markets across North America and Europe, the planned development program, and the maps and data behind the analysis.

Top 400 Regional Markets — North America

← All revisions

d2d6f434 · Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ·

fix(privacy): sync pwoodfine fork with canonical — pulls in 2026-08-03 jmwoodfine@gmail.com redaction (NEXT.md item 20) + 60 other canonical commits since fork diverged

View the full record as of this revision →

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ language: en
language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC
category: markets
type: reference
index_group: north-america-regional-markets
content_type: topic
quality: complete
status: active
@@ -13,16 +14,20 @@ audience: customer-woodfine
bcsc_class: current-fact
short_description: "Ranked list of the 400 highest-scoring North American suburban Regional Markets. Rank 1: Plano, TX (suburb of Dallas, score 25.5)."
paired_with: markets/atlas-top-400-north-america.es.md
last_edited: 2026-06-17
last_edited: 2026-07-16
editor: editorial
---

# Top 400 Regional Markets — North America
**Pending rebuild (2026-08-17).** A newer dataset covering 800 regional markets across Europe and North America is under internal review and is not yet reflected in the table below. The table below still describes the prior selection (369 United States, 23 Canadian, and 8 Mexican markets); the new North American selection is 298 United States, 56 Canadian, and 46 Mexican markets — Mexico's count alone changes enough to warrant its own dedicated page, which does not yet exist. Publication against the new dataset is on hold pending confirmation.

Plano, Texas, a suburb of Dallas 28 km from the metropolitan core, leads the North American ranking with a composite score of 25.5 — three Tier 1 clusters combined with a civic-anchor multiplier. The four hundred highest-scoring Regional Markets span 369 United States, 23 Canadian, and 8 Mexican suburbs across the commuter belts of major metropolitan areas. A *Regional Market* is a named suburb or satellite municipality within commuting distance of a major metropolitan centre that contains one or more retail co-location clusters; markets are ranked by a composite score combining tier composition and civic-anchor presence.

The list identifies commercial markets in the suburban ring of major North American cities — the research gap between institutional metro-market analysis and genuinely rural areas. It is produced separately from lists of metro cores (covered extensively by institutional research) and standalone secondary cities (served by separate analysis).

## Country breakouts

Two countries have enough entries to warrant their own dedicated ranking page — [[atlas-united-states|United States]] (369 markets) and [[atlas-canada|Canada]] (23 markets). Mexico's 8 markets stay in the Country Breakdown table below and the full ranked table; a dedicated page isn't warranted at that count.

## Definition and Scope

A North American Regional Market qualifies for this list when it meets three criteria. First, the settlement must contain at least one co-location cluster — a geographically bounded grouping of major-format retail, hardware, warehouse-club, and civic anchors. Second, the settlement must be a named, legally incorporated place or equivalent administrative unit whose name differs from that of its nearest major metropolitan reference centre. Third, the centroid of the settlement's co-location clusters must lie between 15 and 80 kilometres from the centroid of the nearest major metropolitan reference point; markets closer than 15 kilometres are classified as metro-core areas and markets beyond 80 kilometres are classified as standalone secondary cities — both categories are excluded from this list.
@@ -49,10 +54,10 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | km | T1 | T2 | T3 | Civic | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|----|-------|-------|
| 1 | Plano, TX | US | Dallas | 28 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Yes | 25.5 |
| 1 | [[us-tx-plano|Plano, TX]] | US | Dallas | 28 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Yes | 25.5 |
| 2 | Mesa, AZ | US | Phoenix | 31 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Yes | 22.5 |
| 3 | Frisco, TX | US | Dallas | 44 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Yes | 21.0 |
| 4 | Mississauga, ON | CA | Toronto | 25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Yes | 18.0 |
| 3 | [[us-tx-frisco|Frisco, TX]] | US | Dallas | 44 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Yes | 21.0 |
| 4 | [[ca-on-mississauga|Mississauga, ON]] | CA | Toronto | 25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Yes | 18.0 |
| 5 | Santa Clarita, CA | US | Los Angeles | 48 | 2 | 2 | 0 | Yes | 18.0 |
| 6 | Nashua, NH | US | Boston | 56 | 2 | 2 | 0 | Yes | 18.0 |
| 7 | Warwick, RI | US | Providence | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Yes | 16.5 |
@@ -75,7 +80,7 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,
| 24 | Maple Grove, MN | US | Minneapolis | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 25 | Danvers, MA | US | Boston | 23 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |

## Full Rankings (26–400)
## Appendix: Full Ranked Table (26–400)

### Ranks 26–33 — scores 12.0 to 10.5

@@ -95,7 +100,7 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,
| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 34 | Moorestown-Lenola, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9.0 |
| 35 | Tempe, AZ | US | Phoenix | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9.0 |
| 35 | [[us-az-tempe|Tempe, AZ]] | US | Phoenix | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9.0 |
| 36 | Markham | CA | Toronto | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9.0 |
| 37 | Brandon, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 38 | Huntington Beach, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
@@ -105,7 +110,7 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,
| 42 | Brandermill, VA | US | Richmond | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 43 | Irving, TX | US | Dallas | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 44 | Sandy, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 45 | Spartanburg, SC | US | Greenville SC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 45 | [[us-sc-greenville-spartanburg|Spartanburg, SC]] | US | Greenville SC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 46 | The Woodlands, TX | US | Houston | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 47 | Temecula, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 48 | Denton, TX | US | Fort Worth | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
@@ -184,7 +189,7 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,
| 109 | Owasso, OK | US | Tulsa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 110 | Stratford Downtown, CT | US | New Haven | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 111 | East York, PA | US | Lancaster | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 112 | Torrance, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 112 | [[us-ca-torrance|Torrance, CA]] | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 113 | Lincoln Park, NY | US | Albany | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 114 | Bayou Cane, LA | US | New Orleans | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 115 | San Leandro, CA | US | San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
@@ -365,7 +370,7 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,
| 275 | Issaquah, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 276 | Mayfield Heights, OH | US | Cleveland | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 277 | Oaks, PA | US | Wilmington DE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 278 | Provo, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 278 | [[us-ut-provo-orem|Provo, UT]] | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 279 | Silverdale, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 280 | Owings Mills, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 281 | Whippany, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
@@ -430,7 +435,7 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,
| 330 | Carson, CA | US | Los Angeles | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 331 | Winter Haven, FL | US | Orlando | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 332 | Las Cruces, NM | US | El Paso | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 333 | Kenner, LA | US | New Orleans | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 333 | [[us-la-kenner|Kenner, LA]] | US | New Orleans | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 334 | Delray Beach, FL | US | Miami | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 335 | Covina, CA | US | Los Angeles | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 336 | Mentor, OH | US | Cleveland | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
@@ -474,7 +479,7 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,
| 369 | Woodland, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 370 | Sequim, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 371 | Bel Air South, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 372 | Eagan, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 372 | [[us-mn-eagan|Eagan, MN]] | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 373 | Bradenton, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 374 | Madison Park, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 375 | Mooresville, NC | US | Charlotte | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
@@ -508,10 +513,15 @@ The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below,

| Country | Count | Notes |
|---------|-------|-------|
| United States | 369 | Suburbs of all major US metropolitan areas |
| Canada | 23 | Suburbs of Toronto (8), Vancouver (4), Calgary (2), and others |
| [[atlas-united-states\|United States]] | 369 | Suburbs of all major US metropolitan areas |
| [[atlas-canada\|Canada]] | 23 | Suburbs of Toronto (8), Vancouver (4), Calgary (2), and others |
| Mexico | 8 | Suburbs of Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey |

**Correction (2026-08-02):** the Canada breakdown note above misstates its own
underlying 23 rows — the real count is Toronto 8 (correct), Vancouver 6 (not 4),
Montreal 5 (omitted from the note despite being the second-largest contributor),
Kitchener 2, Detroit 1, Calgary 1 (not 2). **Flagged, not resolved.**

## Data Sources and Methodology

Co-location data is drawn from OpenStreetMap (ODbL licence) filtered by Wikidata chain identifiers, supplemented by civic-anchor records from the Overture Maps Foundation Places dataset (CDLA Permissive 2.0). Cluster boundaries are computed by a two-pass DBSCAN algorithm. Metropolitan reference centroids are drawn from 120 major North American metropolitan areas.
@@ -521,6 +531,5 @@ The suburban-regional classification (15–80 km from the nearest major metro ce
## See Also

- [[about-regional-markets-system|Regional Markets Intelligence System]]
- [[about-regional-market-matrix|Regional Market Matrix]]
- [[co-location-methodology|Co-location Methodology]]
- [[atlas-tier-index-north-america|Tier Index — North America]]
Important Information

Important Information

Securities offering. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine") sponsors real-property direct-hold solutions. Interests in those solutions are offered only to investors who qualify under an applicable prospectus exemption — including the accredited-investor exemption under National Instrument 45-106 — Prospectus Exemptions, and equivalent exemptions in other applicable jurisdictions. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. Any offering is made exclusively by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum, which prospective investors should review, together with their own professional advisors, before investing.

Scope. This wiki describes Woodfine's research methodology, geographic data platform, and related activities at a high level and is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Private Placement Memorandum and the governing documents of the relevant issuer.

Risk. Investment in real-property direct-hold solutions involves significant risk, including possible loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. References to structural features such as advisory fees, transferability, and net asset value methodology describe the contractual terms of the direct-hold solutions and are not representations as to investment outcomes or returns.

Forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results may differ materially. Woodfine undertakes no obligation to update such statements except as required by law.

Registration. Registrable activities of Woodfine and its affiliates are conducted, where required, under the applicable registration categories prescribed by the British Columbia Securities Commission and other Canadian securities regulators. Specific registration details are available on request.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Trademarks. The full trademark notice appears in the footer of every page on this site.

Content licence. The text of this wiki is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Readers may quote this content verbatim, with attribution to Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. Readers may not alter, transform, or redistribute a modified version of this content.

Changes to this notice. Woodfine may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →