Development site monitoring register
Track-B Phase B: fix rollout category — unlinked See-also bullet, dropped ES 'Planned expansion' section (development-regions); missing audience field, See-also section, DP6 correction-callout removal (about-development-site-monitoring-register)
@@ -9,8 +9,9 @@ content_type: topic quality: complete short_description: "Passive tracking register holding qualified co-location sites removed from the active pipeline for adjacent land unavailability, kept scored with documented re-entry criteria." status: stable audience: customer-woodfine bcsc_class: current-fact last_edited: 2026-08-24 last_edited: 2026-09-04 editor: pointsav-engineering language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC source_refs: @@ -25,16 +26,6 @@ The **Development Site Monitoring Register** holds Primary Target locations that A Primary Target that clears a qualifying tier — Local, District, or Regional, per the [[geographic-co-location-methodology|current tier system]] — has demonstrated the co-location and catchment conditions that Woodfine requires. A Fringe cluster does not qualify. The tier verifies that the commercial environment is correct for a Woodfine Building. **Correction (2026-08-02), resolved (2026-08-24):** this section previously cited a fabricated "T1 Valid ≥ 150" scoring threshold from a deprecated points-based system (retired platform-wide 2026-05-16; see [[gis-cluster-scoring-glossary]]). The register's actual re-entry test — a site must remain above the disqualifying floor — is now stated directly against the current tier system: any tier other than Fringe qualifies. This restates the register's original intent (a site qualifies once it clears the lowest bar the tier system sets, not a specific score) without asserting a score-to-tier mapping that does not exist in the current pipeline. Adjacent land availability is a separate condition. A site can have the correct co-location configuration and the correct demographic profile, but lack a parcel adjacent to the Primary Target that is available for acquisition at the time of assessment. This is particularly common in [[about-regional-markets-system|Regional Markets]] where the [[power-centres|Power Centre]] footprint has been fully developed and surrounding parcels are occupied by existing buildings whose owners are not current sellers. The Monitoring Register preserves the investment made in scoring and profiling these sites rather than discarding them from the dataset. The site's qualifying cluster characteristics are not expected to change — the Primary Target is typically a large-format retailer with a long-term lease and substantial capital invested in the site. The probability that adjacent land will eventually become available is a function of normal commercial real estate turnover in the surrounding area. @@ -58,3 +49,11 @@ Sites that satisfy both conditions proceed to the Transaction Summary Report pre ## Relationship to pipeline counts Required development counts for each Direct-Hold Solution — 26 sites for Canada, 52 for the United States, 26 for Mexico — are based on active pipeline sites only. Monitoring Register sites are not counted toward the required development total. The 2:1 minimum shortlist ratio applies to active pipeline sites; the Monitoring Register is a reserve of future pipeline candidates, not a component of the current shortlist calculation. ## See also - [[geographic-co-location-methodology]] — the current tier system a site must clear to qualify - [[gis-cluster-scoring-glossary]] — tier definitions referenced in the re-entry test - [[about-regional-markets-system]] — the market context in which land-availability gaps arise - [[power-centres]] — the Power Centre footprint context for adjacent-land assessment - [[transaction-summary-report-protocol]] — the stage a site advances to upon re-entry