Retail Co-location Methodology
Phase C C2: projects flat-root migration — 47 articles into building-design(23)/site-selection(15)/gis(7)/urban(2); redirects.yaml +47 entries; corpus-wide wikilink fixes (791 replacements, 135 files); fixed stray \x01 control-char corruption in 7 ES files from the wikilink-fix pass
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ --- schema: foundry-doc-v1 title: "Retail Co-location Methodology" slug: co-location-methodology category: site-selection type: topic content_type: topic quality: complete status: active audience: customer-woodfine bcsc_class: current-fact language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC last_edited: 2026-05-22 editor: pointsav-engineering short_description: "A deterministic spatial-analysis framework that ranks commercial real-estate nodes by the objective convergence of independent, capital-intensive retail operators — independent corroboration in place of market sentiment." paired_with: site-selection/co-location-methodology.es.md cites: - ni-51-102 - osc-sn-51-721 - planetizen-retail-clusters - osm-odbl --- Retail development capital is usually committed on comparables and analyst sentiment. Whether independent demand actually converges at a site — the reason it should succeed — is assumed rather than measured. The Woodfine co-location methodology measures it. It ranks development sites by the objective convergence of independent, capital-intensive retail operators, not by market sentiment or analyst forecasts. The framework is operationalised by the [[co-location-ranking-system|deterministic ranking system]] and exposed to platform users via the [[co-location-intelligence-overview|co-location intelligence overview]]. A node qualifies when a hypermarket, a warehouse club, and a home-improvement superstore have each independently committed capital within 1.0 to 3.0 km of one another. Each operator runs its own site-selection process; convergence is independent corroboration, not a single forecast. The qualification logic, [[co-location-cluster-formation|cluster formation]], and the [[co-location-anchors|anchor]] adjacency requirement are the three structural inputs to the index. For a capital allocator the index is a defensive filter: it prioritises the sites where several parties have independently validated the trade area. This article covers the Named-Anchor Model, the three operator tiers, and the five quality tiers; sibling articles describe the [[od-catchment-methodology|O-D catchment methodology]], the [[trade-area-data-sources|trade-area data sources]], and the [[catchment-ranking-methodology-v3|catchment ranking methodology]]. ## The Named-Anchor Model Large-format retailers apply rigorous, data-driven site-selection criteria before committing capital to a market. When several independent operators converge on the same geographic node, that convergence signals a validated commercial corridor — a location where multiple parties have independently confirmed the trade area's strength. The methodology sorts these operators into three tiers, by commercial function and foot-traffic contribution. ### Primary Targets — the anchor The foundational requirement for any evaluated node; the core traffic driver. - **North America:** Walmart Supercentre. - **Europe:** IKEA, as the operational baseline. ### Secondary Targets — commercial support Complementary large-format operators that validate the trade area's commercial depth. They are evaluated within a strict 1.0 km to 3.0 km catchment radius of the Primary Target. - **Secondary-1 (hardware):** Home Depot, Lowe's, Leroy Merlin. - **Secondary-2 (warehouse club):** Costco, Sam's Club, Makro. ### Tertiary Targets — institutional support Civic and institutional infrastructure that provides a non-cyclical, stable demographic baseline. Evaluated within a 5.0 km catchment radius. - **Tertiary-A (healthcare):** major hospitals and medical centres. - **Tertiary-B (higher education):** universities and colleges. ## Quality tiers and site validation Sites are evaluated on a 12-rank matrix that maps to five quality tiers, separating commodity retail nodes from the rare locations where critical commercial elements converge. The map-facing labels — Regional, District, Local, Fringe — follow the ICSC retail property hierarchy described in [[co-location-tier-nomenclature|tier nomenclature]]. | Tier | Description | Commercial validation | |------|-------------|-----------------------| | ★★★★★ | Tier 5 — Full co-location | All four categories present: hardware, warehouse club, healthcare, higher education | | ★★★★ | Tier 4 — Strong co-location | Both commercial secondaries plus one tertiary; one institutional dimension absent | | ★★★ | Tier 3 — Partial co-location | Two categories present: a full secondary pairing, or one secondary with at least one tertiary | | ★★ | Tier 2 — Limited co-location | One category present: hardware only, or warehouse club with a single tertiary | | ★ | Tier 1 — Anchor only | Commercial secondaries largely absent: tertiary-only convergence, or warehouse club only | See [[co-location-ranking-system]] for the complete 12-rank specification, the rank-to-tier mapping, and site counts by tier. ## Strategy and application The co-location index acts as a defensive filter for capital deployment. By focusing on Tier 4 and Tier 5 nodes, an investor prioritises sites with the highest level of independent capital validation and the strongest multi-format demographic anchors. The methodology applies consistently across global markets by mapping regional operators to these canonical roles. A planned expansion integrates logistics and transport data to add a fourth dimension to the matrix; that expansion is forward-looking and framed per `[ni-51-102]` and `[osc-sn-51-721]`. ## See also - [[co-location-ranking-system]] - [[co-location-intelligence-overview]] - [[co-location-anchors]] ## Data sources Anchor and secondary operator locations are sourced from **OpenStreetMap contributors** under the [Open Database Licence (ODbL)](https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/). Records are filtered by canonical Wikidata brand identifiers to ensure consistent chain-family matching across borders. The full chain-to-family mapping is documented in [[retail-brand-family-taxonomy]]. [osm-odbl] ## References - [Retail park](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retail_park) — Wikipedia, accessed 2026-06-14 - [Big-box store](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big-box_store) — Wikipedia, accessed 2026-06-14 - [DBSCAN](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBSCAN) — Wikipedia, accessed 2026-06-14 *OpenStreetMap data © OpenStreetMap contributors, licensed under ODbL.* --- *Copyright © 2026 Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. Licensed under [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).*