Skip to content

Top 400 Regional Markets — North America

← All revisions

4161828e · Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ·

Phase C C3a: markets atlas/framework band — 20 renames (2 about-* framework explainers, 5 atlas-* country surveys, 2 atlas-top-600-*, 2 atlas-top-400-*, 2 atlas-tier-index-*, 7 atlas-co-location-index-*); redirects.yaml +20 entries; 255 corpus-wide wikilink fixes across 118 files. Verification checkpoint passed cleanly before the larger place-profile rename batch.

View the full record as of this revision →

@@ -0,0 +1,526 @@
---
schema: foundry-doc-v1
slug: atlas-top-400-north-america
title: "Top 400 Regional Markets — North America"
language: en
language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC
category: markets
type: reference
content_type: topic
quality: complete
status: active
audience: customer-woodfine
bcsc_class: current-fact
short_description: "Ranked list of the 400 highest-scoring North American suburban Regional Markets. Rank 1: Plano, TX (suburb of Dallas, score 25.5)."
paired_with: markets/atlas-top-400-north-america.es.md
last_edited: 2026-06-17
editor: editorial
---

# Top 400 Regional Markets — North America

Plano, Texas, a suburb of Dallas 28 km from the metropolitan core, leads the North American ranking with a composite score of 25.5 — three Tier 1 clusters combined with a civic-anchor multiplier. The four hundred highest-scoring Regional Markets span 369 United States, 23 Canadian, and 8 Mexican suburbs across the commuter belts of major metropolitan areas. A *Regional Market* is a named suburb or satellite municipality within commuting distance of a major metropolitan centre that contains one or more retail co-location clusters; markets are ranked by a composite score combining tier composition and civic-anchor presence.

The list identifies commercial markets in the suburban ring of major North American cities — the research gap between institutional metro-market analysis and genuinely rural areas. It is produced separately from lists of metro cores (covered extensively by institutional research) and standalone secondary cities (served by separate analysis).

## Definition and Scope

A North American Regional Market qualifies for this list when it meets three criteria. First, the settlement must contain at least one co-location cluster — a geographically bounded grouping of major-format retail, hardware, warehouse-club, and civic anchors. Second, the settlement must be a named, legally incorporated place or equivalent administrative unit whose name differs from that of its nearest major metropolitan reference centre. Third, the centroid of the settlement's co-location clusters must lie between 15 and 80 kilometres from the centroid of the nearest major metropolitan reference point; markets closer than 15 kilometres are classified as metro-core areas and markets beyond 80 kilometres are classified as standalone secondary cities — both categories are excluded from this list.

The geographic coherence constraint requires that all co-location clusters within a single named settlement lie within a 200-kilometre bounding box. Settlements failing this constraint are name-collision aggregations and are excluded from the ranked list.

## Ranking Methodology

The composite score is the product of three factors. *Tier score* counts four points per Tier 1 cluster, two points per Tier 2 cluster, and one point per Tier 3 cluster. *Civic multiplier* is 1.5 when at least one cluster in the market includes a medical or academic anchor and 1.0 otherwise. *Confidence factor* is 1.0 for high-confidence markets and 0.7 for provisional markets.

The full formula is: *Score = tier_score × civic_multiplier × confidence_factor*.

The three tiers describe progressively richer combinations of retail anchor categories. *Tier 1* (T1) clusters contain a hypermarket (such as Walmart Supercenter, Target, Meijer, or H-E-B), a home-improvement warehouse (Home Depot or Lowe's), and a warehouse club (Costco, Sam's Club, or BJ's). *Tier 2* (T2) clusters contain a hypermarket and a hardware anchor without a warehouse club. *Tier 3* (T3) clusters contain a single recognised anchor category.

The highest composite score in the current dataset is 25.5 (Plano, Texas, a suburb of Dallas). The minimum score among the ranked 400 is 4.0. Three markets score 20 or above, ten markets score 15 or above, and the majority of the top 400 fall between 4.0 and 12.0.

## Suburban Geography

The 400 markets span 369 United States, 23 Canadian, and 8 Mexican suburbs. The metropolitan areas generating the largest numbers of qualifying suburbs are New York (25 suburbs in the top 400), Chicago (22), and Los Angeles (18). Dallas, Boston, Miami, and Tampa each contribute 10 or more suburbs.

## Top 25

The twenty-five highest-ranked North American Regional Markets are listed below, with the metropolitan centre each market is a suburb of.

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | km | T1 | T2 | T3 | Civic | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|----|-------|-------|
| 1 | Plano, TX | US | Dallas | 28 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Yes | 25.5 |
| 2 | Mesa, AZ | US | Phoenix | 31 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Yes | 22.5 |
| 3 | Frisco, TX | US | Dallas | 44 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Yes | 21.0 |
| 4 | Mississauga, ON | CA | Toronto | 25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Yes | 18.0 |
| 5 | Santa Clarita, CA | US | Los Angeles | 48 | 2 | 2 | 0 | Yes | 18.0 |
| 6 | Nashua, NH | US | Boston | 56 | 2 | 2 | 0 | Yes | 18.0 |
| 7 | Warwick, RI | US | Providence | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Yes | 16.5 |
| 8 | McKinney, TX | US | Dallas | 46 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Yes | 15.0 |
| 9 | Brampton | CA | Toronto | 30 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Yes | 15.0 |
| 10 | Chesapeake, VA | US | Virginia Beach | 31 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Yes | 15.0 |
| 11 | Surrey | CA | Vancouver | 26 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Yes | 13.5 |
| 12 | Vaughan, Ontario | CA | Toronto | 22 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Yes | 13.5 |
| 13 | Irvine, CA | US | Riverside | 52 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Yes | 13.5 |
| 14 | Pembroke Pines, FL | US | Miami | 30 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 15 | Chandler, AZ | US | Phoenix | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 16 | Niles, IL | US | Chicago | 29 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 17 | Scottsdale, AZ | US | Phoenix | 23 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 18 | Waterloo, ON | CA | Kitchener | 23 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 19 | Clearwater, FL | US | Tampa | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 20 | Joliet, IL | US | Chicago | 56 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 21 | Levittown, NY | US | New York | 33 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 22 | Murrieta, CA | US | Riverside | 49 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 23 | Corona, CA | US | Riverside | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 24 | Maple Grove, MN | US | Minneapolis | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |
| 25 | Danvers, MA | US | Boston | 23 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 12.0 |

## Full Rankings (26–400)

### Ranks 26–33 — scores 12.0 to 10.5

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 26 | Livonia, MI | US | Detroit | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12.0 |
| 27 | Novi, MI | US | Detroit | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12.0 |
| 28 | Horsham, PA | US | Philadelphia | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12.0 |
| 29 | Buford, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.5 |
| 30 | Pearland, TX | US | Houston | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.5 |
| 31 | Coral Springs, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.5 |
| 32 | Overland Park, KS | US | Kansas City | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.5 |
| 33 | Grand Prairie, TX | US | Dallas | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.5 |

### Ranks 34–67 — scores 9.0 to 8.0

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 34 | Moorestown-Lenola, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9.0 |
| 35 | Tempe, AZ | US | Phoenix | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9.0 |
| 36 | Markham | CA | Toronto | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9.0 |
| 37 | Brandon, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 38 | Huntington Beach, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 39 | Anaheim, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 40 | Stockbridge, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 41 | La Habra, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 42 | Brandermill, VA | US | Richmond | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 43 | Irving, TX | US | Dallas | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 44 | Sandy, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 45 | Spartanburg, SC | US | Greenville SC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 46 | The Woodlands, TX | US | Houston | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 47 | Temecula, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 48 | Denton, TX | US | Fort Worth | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 49 | Appleton, WI | US | Green Bay | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 50 | St. Peters, MO | US | St. Louis | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 51 | Forney, TX | US | Dallas | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 52 | Mount Clemens, MI | US | Detroit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 53 | Sicklerville, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 54 | St. Joseph, MO | US | Kansas City | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 55 | Visalia, CA | US | Fresno | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 56 | Lakewood Ranch, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 57 | Hawthorne, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 58 | Pueblo, CO | US | Colorado Springs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 59 | Lodi, CA | US | Stockton | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 60 | Victorville, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 61 | Sandy Springs, GA | US | Kennesaw | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 62 | Gaithersburg, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 63 | Laval | CA | Montreal | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 64 | Abbotsford, BC | CA | Vancouver | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 65 | Olathe, KS | US | Kansas City | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 66 | Johns Creek, GA | US | Kennesaw | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 67 | Commack, NY | US | New York | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8.0 |

### Ranks 68–107 — scores 7.5 to 6.3

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 68 | Folsom, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 69 | Lone Tree, CO | US | Denver | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 70 | Costa Mesa, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 71 | Garden Grove, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 72 | Slidell, LA | US | New Orleans | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 73 | Hoover, AL | US | Birmingham | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 74 | Murfreesboro, TN | US | Nashville | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 75 | Vacaville, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 76 | Davie, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 77 | Palmdale, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 78 | Mechanicsburg, PA | US | Lancaster | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 79 | Newport News, VA | US | Virginia Beach | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 80 | Shakopee, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 81 | Thornton, CO | US | Denver | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 82 | Severn, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 83 | Loveland, CO | US | Denver | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 84 | Oceanside, CA | US | San Diego | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 85 | Round Rock, TX | US | Austin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 86 | Sunrise, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 87 | Niagara Falls, NY | US | St. Catharines | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 88 | The Villages, FL | US | Orlando | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 89 | Burnsville, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 90 | Lakeland, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 91 | Downey, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 92 | Burbank, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 93 | Lewisville, TX | US | Dallas | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 94 | Methuen Town, MA | US | Boston | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 95 | Southlake, TX | US | Fort Worth | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 96 | Rockwall, TX | US | Dallas | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 97 | Longmont, CO | US | Denver | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 98 | Daytona Beach, FL | US | Orlando | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 99 | Newmarket, ON | CA | Toronto | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 100 | Ecatepec de Morelos | MX | Mexico City | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 101 | Celaya, Guanajuato | MX | Querétaro | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 102 | Toluca | MX | Mexico City | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 103 | Riverview, FL | US | Tampa | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 104 | Asheville, NC | US | Greenville SC | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 105 | Bolingbrook, IL | US | Chicago | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7.5 |
| 106 | Baja California | US | Tijuana | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.3 |
| 107 | California | MX | San Diego | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6.3 |

### Ranks 108–307 — single Tier 1 cluster markets, score 6.0

#### Ranks 108–157

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 108 | Goldsboro, NC | US | Raleigh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 109 | Owasso, OK | US | Tulsa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 110 | Stratford Downtown, CT | US | New Haven | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 111 | East York, PA | US | Lancaster | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 112 | Torrance, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 113 | Lincoln Park, NY | US | Albany | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 114 | Bayou Cane, LA | US | New Orleans | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 115 | San Leandro, CA | US | San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 116 | Gastonia, NC | US | Charlotte | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 117 | Lake Magdalene, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 118 | Hialeah, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 119 | Dania Beach, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 120 | Southaven, MS | US | Memphis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 121 | Rancho Cordova, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 122 | Moore, OK | US | Oklahoma City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 123 | Kannapolis, NC | US | Charlotte | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 124 | Country Club, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 125 | Millville, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 126 | Cockeysville, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 127 | Goodyear, AZ | US | Phoenix | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 128 | Seabrook Beach, NH | US | Boston | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 129 | Glen Carbon, IL | US | St. Louis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 130 | Florin, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 131 | Elk Grove, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 132 | Gulfport, MS | US | Mobile | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 133 | Long Beach, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 134 | Signal Hill, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 135 | Orem, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 136 | McKee City, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 137 | West Jordan, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 138 | Milton, GA | US | Kennesaw | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 139 | Kirkwood, MO | US | St. Louis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 140 | Wescosville, PA | US | Wilmington DE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 141 | Tukwila, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 142 | Eden Prairie, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 143 | King of Prussia, PA | US | Wilmington DE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 144 | Wake Forest, NC | US | Raleigh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 145 | Dulles Town Center, VA | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 146 | New Castle, DE | US | Wilmington DE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 147 | East Farmingdale, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 148 | Hot Springs, AR | US | Little Rock | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 149 | Puyallup, WA | US | Tacoma | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 150 | American Fork, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 151 | South Valley Stream, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 152 | Inwood, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 153 | Mason, OH | US | Cincinnati | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 154 | Independence, MO | US | Kansas City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 155 | Florida City, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 156 | Laguna Niguel, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 157 | Hybla Valley, VA | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |

#### Ranks 158–207

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 158 | Seven Fields, PA | US | Pittsburgh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 159 | Clermont, FL | US | Orlando | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 160 | Riverton, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 161 | Ballenger Creek, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 162 | Gilroy, CA | US | San Jose | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 163 | Skokie, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 164 | Homeacre-Lyndora, PA | US | Pittsburgh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 165 | Taylor, MI | US | Detroit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 166 | Wentzville, MO | US | St. Louis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 167 | Chicopee, MA | US | Hartford | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 168 | Vernon Hills, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 169 | Humble, TX | US | Houston | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 170 | San Dimas, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 171 | Ames, IA | US | Des Moines | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 172 | Metuchen, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 173 | St. Petersburg, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 174 | Oakbrook Terrace, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 175 | Lady Lake, FL | US | Orlando | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 176 | Merced, CA | US | Modesto | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 177 | Maplewood, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 178 | Martinsville, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 179 | Smith Mills, MA | US | Providence | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 180 | Framingham, MA | US | Boston | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 181 | Pittsfield, MA | US | Albany | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 182 | Harris Hill, NY | US | Buffalo | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 183 | Salinas, CA | US | San Jose | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 184 | Castle Rock, CO | US | Denver | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 185 | Norman, OK | US | Oklahoma City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 186 | Elgin, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 187 | Uniondale, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 188 | Orland Park, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 189 | Citrus Heights, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 190 | Port Orange, FL | US | Orlando | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 191 | Waterford, CT | US | Hartford | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 192 | Duluth, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 193 | Wallingford Center, CT | US | New Haven | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 194 | Sumas, BC | US | Vancouver | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 195 | Turlock, CA | US | Modesto | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 196 | Kenilworth, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 197 | Peachtree City, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 198 | Lynnwood, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 199 | The Hammocks, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 200 | Paramus, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 201 | Hasbrouck Heights, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 202 | Douglasville, GA | US | Kennesaw | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 203 | Matthews, NC | US | Charlotte | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 204 | Crystal Lake, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 205 | Alafaya, FL | US | Orlando | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 206 | Bowie, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 207 | Colonial Heights, VA | US | Richmond | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |

#### Ranks 208–257

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 208 | Flemington, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 209 | Rohnert Park, CA | US | San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 210 | Conroe, TX | US | Houston | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 211 | Pflugerville, TX | US | Austin | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 212 | Cumming, GA | US | Kennesaw | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 213 | Hampton, VA | US | Virginia Beach | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 214 | Snellville, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 215 | Easton, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 216 | Northlake, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 217 | Mount Prospect, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 218 | Gardena, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 219 | Hiram, GA | US | Kennesaw | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 220 | Hanover, PA | US | Lancaster | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 221 | Chamblee, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 222 | Maryville, TN | US | Knoxville | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 223 | Leisure Village East, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 224 | Pomona, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 225 | Layton, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 226 | Yardville, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 227 | Jeannette, PA | US | Pittsburgh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 228 | Willoughby, OH | US | Cleveland | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 229 | Naperville, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 230 | Menomonee Falls, WI | US | Milwaukee | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 231 | Hickory, NC | US | Charlotte | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 232 | Belton, MO | US | Kansas City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 233 | Robertsville, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 234 | Riverhead, NY | US | New Haven | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 235 | Denham Springs, LA | US | Baton Rouge | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 236 | Ferguson, MO | US | St. Louis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 237 | Newport East, RI | US | Providence | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 238 | Coon Rapids, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 239 | Pewaukee, WI | US | Milwaukee | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 240 | West Freehold, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 241 | East Washington, PA | US | Pittsburgh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 242 | Evergreen Park, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 243 | Hobart, IN | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 244 | Hodgkins, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 245 | Bloomingdale, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 246 | Mehlville, MO | US | St. Louis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 247 | Yuba City, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 248 | Tracy, CA | US | Stockton | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 249 | Bon Air, VA | US | Richmond | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 250 | Spanish Fork, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 251 | Newnan, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 252 | Simi Valley, CA | US | Oxnard | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 253 | Kokomo, IN | US | Indianapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 254 | McDonough, GA | US | Atlanta | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 255 | Lake Zurich, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 256 | Fruitville, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 257 | Seven Corners, VA | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |

#### Ranks 258–307

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 258 | Jericho, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 259 | Parole, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 260 | Madison Heights, MI | US | Detroit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 261 | Montgomeryville, PA | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 262 | Brookside, DE | US | Wilmington DE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 263 | Paxtonia, PA | US | Lancaster | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 264 | Glenview, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 265 | West Nyack, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 266 | Port Chester, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 267 | Sevierville, TN | US | Knoxville | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 268 | Goleta, CA | US | Oxnard | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 269 | Woburn, MA | US | Boston | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 270 | San Ramon, CA | US | San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 271 | Clifton, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 272 | San Mateo, CA | US | San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 273 | Vallejo, CA | US | San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 274 | San Bruno, CA | US | San Francisco | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 275 | Issaquah, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 276 | Mayfield Heights, OH | US | Cleveland | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 277 | Oaks, PA | US | Wilmington DE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 278 | Provo, UT | US | Salt Lake City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 279 | Silverdale, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 280 | Owings Mills, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 281 | Whippany, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 282 | Randolph Town, MA | US | Boston | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 283 | Plymouth Meeting, PA | US | Philadelphia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 284 | Waukesha, WI | US | Milwaukee | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 285 | Gig Harbor, WA | US | Tacoma | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 286 | Nampa, ID | US | Boise | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 287 | Grafton, WI | US | Milwaukee | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 288 | Singac, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 289 | Summerlin South, NV | US | Las Vegas | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 290 | Smyrna, TN | US | Nashville | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 291 | Pontiac, MI | US | Detroit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 292 | Akron, OH | US | Cleveland | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 293 | Mission Viejo, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 294 | Pelham Manor, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 295 | Dedham, MA | US | Boston | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 296 | Bridgeport, CT | US | New Haven | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 297 | Palo Alto, CA | US | San Jose | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 298 | Edmonds, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 299 | Coquitlam, BC | CA | Vancouver | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 300 | Pointe-Claire | CA | Montreal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 301 | Bellefeuille, Quebec | CA | Montreal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 302 | Ajax, ON | CA | Toronto | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 303 | Port Coquitlam, BC | CA | Vancouver | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 304 | Huixquilucan | MX | Mexico City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 305 | Coacalco de Berriozábal | MX | Mexico City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 306 | Metepec | MX | Mexico City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 307 | Atizapán de Zaragoza | MX | Mexico City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 |

### Ranks 308–328 — Tier 2 combination markets, score 6.0

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 308 | Edmond, OK | US | Oklahoma City | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6.0 |
| 309 | Surprise, AZ | US | Phoenix | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6.0 |
| 310 | Escondido, CA | US | San Diego | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 311 | Richardson, TX | US | Dallas | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 312 | Renton, WA | US | Seattle | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 313 | Dublin, CA | US | San Jose | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 314 | Lowell, MA | US | Boston | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 315 | Downers Grove, IL | US | Chicago | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 316 | Brockton, MA | US | Boston | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 317 | Leominster, MA | US | Worcester | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 318 | Arnold, MO | US | St. Louis | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 319 | Fairfield, CA | US | Sacramento | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 320 | Wadsworth, OH | US | Cleveland | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 321 | Jasmine Estates, FL | US | Tampa | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 322 | Hammond, LA | US | Baton Rouge | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 323 | Lorain, OH | US | Cleveland | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 324 | Schererville, IN | US | Chicago | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 325 | Rochester Hills, MI | US | Detroit | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 326 | Kent, WA | US | Tacoma | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 327 | Chatham-Kent, ON | CA | Detroit | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |
| 328 | Guelph, Ontario | CA | Kitchener | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.0 |

### Ranks 329–366 — scores 5.0 to 4.5

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 329 | Waldorf, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 330 | Carson, CA | US | Los Angeles | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 331 | Winter Haven, FL | US | Orlando | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 332 | Las Cruces, NM | US | El Paso | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 333 | Kenner, LA | US | New Orleans | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 334 | Delray Beach, FL | US | Miami | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 335 | Covina, CA | US | Los Angeles | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 336 | Mentor, OH | US | Cleveland | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 337 | Trussville, AL | US | Birmingham | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 338 | Cedar Park, TX | US | Austin | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 339 | Weymouth Town, MA | US | Boston | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 340 | Withamsville, OH | US | Cincinnati | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 341 | Sugar Land, TX | US | Houston | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 342 | Tuscaloosa, AL | US | Birmingham | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 343 | Garland, TX | US | Dallas | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 344 | Gilbert, AZ | US | Phoenix | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 345 | Short Pump, VA | US | Richmond | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 346 | Pinellas Park, FL | US | Tampa | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 347 | Noblesville, IN | US | Indianapolis | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 348 | Four Corners, FL | US | Orlando | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 349 | Strongsville, OH | US | Cleveland | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 350 | North Miami, FL | US | Miami | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 351 | Allen, TX | US | Dallas | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 352 | Lake Forest, CA | US | Riverside | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 353 | New Braunfels, TX | US | San Antonio | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 354 | Gonzales, LA | US | Baton Rouge | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 355 | West Berlin, NJ | US | Philadelphia | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 356 | Sterling Heights, MI | US | Detroit | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 357 | Upland, CA | US | Riverside | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 358 | Burleson, TX | US | Fort Worth | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 359 | Ballwin, MO | US | St. Louis | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 360 | Tomball, TX | US | Houston | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 361 | Santa Rosa, CA | US | San Francisco | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 362 | Ann Arbor, MI | US | Detroit | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 363 | Monroeville, PA | US | Pittsburgh | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 364 | Pompano Beach, FL | US | Miami | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 365 | Richmond Hill, Ontario | CA | Toronto | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 366 | Oshawa, ON | CA | Toronto | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |

### Ranks 367–400 — scores 4.2 to 4.0

| Rank | Market | Country | Suburb of | T1 | T2 | T3 | Score |
|------|--------|---------|-----------|----|----|----|-------|
| 367 | Langley District Municipality | CA | Vancouver | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 |
| 368 | Santee, CA | US | San Diego | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 369 | Woodland, CA | US | Sacramento | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 370 | Sequim, WA | US | Seattle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 371 | Bel Air South, MD | US | Baltimore | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 372 | Eagan, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 373 | Bradenton, FL | US | Tampa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 374 | Madison Park, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 375 | Mooresville, NC | US | Charlotte | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 376 | Gurnee, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 377 | Harwick, PA | US | Pittsburgh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 378 | Ledgewood, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 379 | Rock Hill, SC | US | Charlotte | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 380 | Watchung, NJ | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 381 | Mount Juliet, TN | US | Nashville | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 382 | Bonney Lake, WA | US | Tacoma | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 383 | Westland, MI | US | Detroit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 384 | Radisson, NY | US | Syracuse | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 385 | Industry, CA | US | Los Angeles | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 386 | Poway, CA | US | San Diego | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 387 | Algonquin, IL | US | Chicago | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 388 | Lake Elsinore, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 389 | Chesterfield, MO | US | St. Louis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 390 | South Miami Heights, FL | US | Miami | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 391 | Sherwood Manor, CT | US | Hartford | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 392 | Holbrook, NY | US | New Haven | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 393 | Chaska, MN | US | Minneapolis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 394 | Nanuet, NY | US | New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 395 | Auburn Hills, MI | US | Detroit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 396 | Eastvale, CA | US | Riverside | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 397 | Boisbriand, QC | CA | Montreal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 398 | Nanaimo, BC | CA | Vancouver | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 399 | Vaudreuil-Dorion, QC | CA | Montreal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 400 | Okotoks | CA | Calgary | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |

## Country Breakdown

| Country | Count | Notes |
|---------|-------|-------|
| United States | 369 | Suburbs of all major US metropolitan areas |
| Canada | 23 | Suburbs of Toronto (8), Vancouver (4), Calgary (2), and others |
| Mexico | 8 | Suburbs of Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey |

## Data Sources and Methodology

Co-location data is drawn from OpenStreetMap (ODbL licence) filtered by Wikidata chain identifiers, supplemented by civic-anchor records from the Overture Maps Foundation Places dataset (CDLA Permissive 2.0). Cluster boundaries are computed by a two-pass DBSCAN algorithm. Metropolitan reference centroids are drawn from 120 major North American metropolitan areas.

The suburban-regional classification (15–80 km from the nearest major metro centroid) is a filter applied before scoring, not a score component. Every market in this list is already in the suburban band; no distance bonus or penalty is applied within the list. This design reflects the research intent: the list surfaces the suburban ring as a distinct analysis tier, not a continuum from metro core to rural periphery.

## See Also

- [[about-regional-markets-system|Regional Markets Intelligence System]]
- [[about-regional-market-matrix|Regional Market Matrix]]
- [[co-location-methodology|Co-location Methodology]]
- [[atlas-tier-index-north-america|Tier Index — North America]]
Important Information

Important Information

Securities offering. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine") sponsors real-property direct-hold solutions. Interests in those solutions are offered only to investors who qualify under an applicable prospectus exemption — including the accredited-investor exemption under National Instrument 45-106 — Prospectus Exemptions, and equivalent exemptions in other applicable jurisdictions. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. Any offering is made exclusively by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum, which prospective investors should review, together with their own professional advisors, before investing.

Scope. This wiki describes Woodfine's research methodology, geographic data platform, and related activities at a high level and is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Private Placement Memorandum and the governing documents of the relevant issuer.

Risk. Investment in real-property direct-hold solutions involves significant risk, including possible loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. References to structural features such as advisory fees, transferability, and net asset value methodology describe the contractual terms of the direct-hold solutions and are not representations as to investment outcomes or returns.

Forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and actual results may differ materially. Woodfine undertakes no obligation to update such statements except as required by law.

Registration. Registrable activities of Woodfine and its affiliates are conducted, where required, under the applicable registration categories prescribed by the British Columbia Securities Commission and other Canadian securities regulators. Specific registration details are available on request.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Trademarks. See TRADEMARK.md in this repository for the full trademark notice.

Changes to this notice. Woodfine may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →